apostate brings more details:
Abortion is morally neutral, in my view, because no person is affected by it except the woman making the decision. She is best placed, therefore, to make that decision for herself according to her own moral lights. I m okay with a woman deciding she can t morally justify an abortion. I m also okay with a woman deciding her moral values aren t contradicted by ending a pregnancy.
However, fistyouth thinks differently:
The FBI’s lackadaisical approach to the arrest of anti-abortion terrorists, who are part of a movement with a decades-long track record of bombings and assassinations in this country, stands in stark contrast to their much publicized role in the so-called “war on terror.†In May the FBI arrested four Black men in Newburgh, N.Y., after what was described as a year-long undercover anti-terrorism investigation. The men, including a mentally ill Haitian immigrant, were arrested for “conspiring†to use “weapons of mass destruction,†such as a stinger missile, even though there is no evidence they ever came close to obtaining actual weapons.
In other words, epmediagroup puts it this way:
About Planned Parenthood s sex-crazed abortion business with 17 comments Click here for the full story from Catholic Online about reactions to closure of El Paso Planned Parenthood clinics. Some excerpts:
Ta-Nehisi Coates shows how it is done:
Reply Invisman52 (Replying to: Ta-Nehisi Coates ) June 7, 2009 2:48 PM To back up the point on the Dred Scott case:
Russ Shaw thinks about it:
The timing of Tiller s killing is particularly awf... Can teens stay connected without losing touch? OSV acquires Harcourt Religion
Roxana Hegeman can't forget that:
Crime News Five killed, 100 injured in Madhya Pradesh factory blasts Five feared dead in Madhya Pradesh factory explosions More Vermont church properties face liens to cover awards in priest sex abuse trials Property dealer shot dead in Noida Nepali woman gang raped in Delhi Railway exam disrupted by pro-Kannada in Karnataka Three poverty-stricken sisters commit suicide Texas City man accused of wrapping chain around teenage son's neck, spraying him with Mace
Chip Berlet does not seem to agree with this. In his own words:
Bill O'Reilly Defends His Comments On Tiller: "No Backpedaling Here" (VIDEO) On Monday night, Bill O'Reilly responded to accusations that he helped fuel hatred and violence against Dr. George Tiller, the abortion doctor shot and killed...
Webmaster also takes into account the following fact:
It is also the charitable wing of Right to Life, an organisation that lobbies MPs about abortion and other moral issues.
Having that in mind, Elisabeth Garber-Paul wonders:
Singer, the Ira W. DeCamp Professor of Bioethics at Princeton University, and laureate professor at the Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics (CAPPE), University of Melbourne, made a particularly interesting point, and brought the discussion to the most basic levelâ€"why is killing a human being wrong? The failure of the public to be able to tackle this ancient philosophical question, he says, is part of the reason that the abortion debate has been so stunted. Instead, we’ve focused on whether or not the fetus is a human being, without looking at the underlying questions of what makes killing a human being wrong. In one sense, Singer says, the fact that the fetus is a member of our species and alive makes it a human being.
Meanwhile, William Saletan came up with this idea:
utilitarianism utility virtual reality war water Blogroll 3 Quarks Aetiology AJOB Blog Bad Astronomy BetterHumans Bioethics Discussion Biopolitical Times BoingBoing Art Caplan Cosmic Variance Danger Room Darwiniana Framing Science Freakonomics Malcolm Gladwell Global Bioethics Blog KurzweilAI.net IEET blog Jennifer Lahl Lancet blog MedGadget Chris Mooney Nobel Intent Jeremy Manier Not Dead Yet Our Bodies, Our Blog Pharyngula Science Progress blog Scientific Blogging Sex, Drugs, and DNA Slashdot Wesley Smith Threat Level TierneyLab Well Wired Science Gregor Wolbring Carl Zimmer Genome Boy Andrew Sullivan Human Nature Network Blog Essays Discussions Books Links
digital paul might have an idea about it:
Skoal KodiakSolid GoldTentacle BoyThe CedarTo Kill A Petty BourgeoisieTriple Rockturf club
Stephen Hand also takes into account the following fact:
See also TCR's Geopolitical Page SAVE INTERNET FREE SPEECH Warning! SEARCH CATEGORIES INDEX This website is a Free Speech-Free educational Inquiry Zone, it operates wholly within the context of Constitutionally protected free speech of the United States of America and the Fair Use principles provided in the U.S. Code.
Chip Berlet can't forget that:
Mike Lux: Political Violence in America It is undeniably true that there is a dangerous and virulent streak of violence and fascism in American conservatism, now and throughout our country's history.
Hanlon brings some great news:
June 2009 M T W T F S S « May 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
However, The Huffington Post News Editors states that:
With the correct use of these pills, Gomperts argues, a woman can terminate a pregnancy in the privacy of her own home, without the discomfort or expense of a hospital or clinic visit. This advancement towards autonomy in abortion practice poses an enormous threat to anti-abortion factions, as it becomes more difficult to control who has an abortion and when. Indeed this autonomy gives pause even to pro-choice medical professionals, who prefer to administer abortions in the controlled environment of a clinic or a hospital.
Russ Shaw points out another thing aside from that:
Mary DeTurris Poust New York-based Mary DeTurris Poust is a former OSV contributing editor and author of The Complete Idiot s Guide to the Catholic Catechism.
Darren Lenard Hutchinson thinks that the problem is:
orfactual equivalents. Notes of a conversation between Nixon and Ronald Reagan (then Governor of California) reveal that Reagan praised the infamous Saturday Night Massacre as probably the best thing that ever happened none of them belong where they were. . . ."
Still being unsure, Amy Dempsey asks:
Contraception Latina Teen Pregnancy Surveys Should Avoid Blame State-level Anti-Choice Efforts Target Pharmacies and Provider Conscience Laws A Cure for Chinese Population Control: Video Games? Subscribe
Sources:
apostate fistyouth epmediagroup Ta-Nehisi Coates Russ Shaw Roxana Hegeman Chip Berlet Webmaster Elisabeth Garber-Paul William Saletan digital paul Stephen Hand Hanlon The Huffington Post News Editors Darren Lenard Hutchinson Amy Dempsey
Disclaimer:
This text is automatically generated from different sources on the internet. It must be considered an experiment
Saturday, August 15, 2009
Abortion From: Apostate Fistyouth Epmediagroup Ta-Nehisi Coates Russ Shaw Roxana Hegeman Chip Berlet Webmaster Elisabeth Garber-Paul William Saletan Digital Paul Stephen Hand Hanlon The Huffington Post News Editors Darren Lenard Hutchinson Amy Dempsey /26710391
Abortion From: Suzanne Suzanne Alana Kornfeld Kenneth Hynek Mike Volpe Tenured Radical Okanogen John Amato GrannyGrump Chris Jones Kleinheider Clueless Emma Mike None@example.com David Weigel Evil Bender Goyodelarosa /26710389
Suzanne thinks that the problem is:
The Shotgun Marc Emery s Farewell Tour comes to Calgary; libertarian leader prepares for jail - Marc Emery was in Calgary on Sunday night on the first stop in his Farewell Tour that will take the marijuana legalization activist across the country to s... 8 hours ago
Suzanne shows how it is done:
Whispers in the Loggia "Caritas" 101 - In prep for tomorrow's release of B16's first major contribution to the church's "social magisterium," the Mothership's Don Clemmer has posted a useful pri... 14 hours ago
Alana Kornfeld brings some great news:
Church-Going 'Martyr' Changes Dynamics of Abortion Debate Tuesday June 2, 2009 Dr. George Tiller's murder on Sunday (May 31) morning in the lobby of his Lutheran church counters the secular image of a late-term abortion provider, pinning him more as a churchgoing "martyr" than a godless murderer.
Kenneth Hynek notices:
In like manner, the issue of just what resides in the womb affects, or is related to, the dignity of each human person as well a human person. And much like proponents of the HRC s fail to see that their support of censorship undermines their own fundamental human right to speak their minds freely, proponents of abortion fail to see that their attempts to limit, abrogate, or deny the human dignity of the unborn undermine their ability to defend their own human dignity.
Similarly, mike volpe adds:
The debate started with a critical question from O'Reilly. Does Ms. Walsh believe that a fetus in the third trimester have any rights? It took her a long time to answer the question but ultimately she believes that no fetus has any rights at any time.
Tenured Radical is absolutely sure that:
As one of those foreigners in the US who wishes he could stay with his partner of many years, I also find the argument that my status could be regularized through other means a little tired. After all, the kind of immigration reform you suggest would require a fight against the very strong post-9/11 mentality that does not want porous national boundaries. I agree, though, that marriage should not be a solution to the immigration issue, and I wish this the immigration issue received more attention. However, if I had marriage as an option, I wouldn t hesitate to use it to my advantage (as several of my heterosexual colleagues at various universities have).
Despite the previous arguments, okanogen has many reasons to think otherwise:
Be the first on your block... ... to wear a Single Payer T-Shirt From Corrente! "You may think you’re insured... but wait ‘til the insurance companies change your policyâ€"or you change your job. Or lose it. Health care is a right. I support Single Payer." Half our massive profits go to start our micro-lending project; half go to keep the hamsters in kibble! Don't delay, because this Corrente collectible won't be on sale long! MR SUBLIMINAL Until somebody with better design skills than lambert steps up!
For this purpose, John Amato suggests:
Re: Rachel Maddow uncovers new threats on abortion clinics Thu, 06/11/2009 - 17:18 â€" Taarak Yes, that's how civil wars are started. Angry people are so easily manipulated. There's plenty to be angry about in the US right now, but most people don't know why they are angry. Give them an easy target and all of their anger and frustration then has a relief. Tell them who is at fault, and they will scream and yell right into self-destruction. Login or register to reply
GrannyGrump does not seem to agree with this. In his own words:
Tiller's Defense: Larry Said I Could: A look at what Tiller admitted on the stand in his trialTiller Trial: The Plot Thickens
Chris Jones comes with the facts:
Conservative evangelicals have gotten precious little for their support of Republicans in the past thirty years. Abortion remains legal. School Prayer is not allowed. Intelligent Design is not taught in public schools; evolution is. The only scraps they’ve been handed were ephemeral bans on embryonic stem-cell research and gay marriage. Still, on their biggest issues, Republicans have failed to deliver.
Kleinheider considers that:
Women s Health News » At Our Bodies Our Blog: Research Priorities, and More BS Posturing on Women s Health for Political Gain Posted 29 hours ago
Clueless Emma notices:
The Berean Call Travel UNIVERSAL HEALTHCARE Web/Tech WORDS OF THE WISE Archives June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 More...
Mike none@example.com considers that:
I certainly don't want abortion to be illegal. I have no patience for those who oppose all abortions for merely religious reasons. They are wasting their energy protesting when they could be using it to help the woman described above who wants a child but needs help with education and services. They could make a serious dent in the numbers of one type of abortion.
John Amato notices:
)O( Fri, 06/12/2009 - 05:46 â€" ysbaddaden Playboy was technically the first mass produced erotica although t and appeared in 1953, although the roots are ancient; the pill only became widely common in the 1960's and 70's (so you got the order criss-crossed), whereas drug use and infidelity has been around since time immemorial. Login or register to reply
David Weigel does not seem to agree with this. In his own words:
Joseph M. Scheidler , the national director of the Pro-Life Action League, argued that the reaction to Tiller â€" including the federal marshals â€" was “just a show,†and no different from how “the abortionists blame the pro-life movement for everything, anyway.â€
Evil Bender can't forget that:
I must admit, I can t actually bring myself to mock this. Roberts is actually opposed to laws designed to protect children from neglectful, desperate, or otherwise unfit parents. He s opposed to abortion, but also opposed to laws designed to make it safe for parents who cannot care for their children to give them up without fearing legal sanction. And he admits this while accusing reproductive rights advocates of being immoral for not caring about children.
goyodelarosa objects:
Collective Works Gallery Community Arts Council of Greater Victoria Community Marine Concepts LP (Victoria International Marina) CONSERVATIVES B. C.
Suzanne gives a bit of an idea about it:
ZENIT RSS-Newsfeed Time for G-8 to Re-make Broken Promises, Says Caritas [2009-07-06] - Risks Continued "Robbing the Poor to Feed the Rich" 22 hours ago
Sources:
Suzanne Suzanne Alana Kornfeld Kenneth Hynek mike volpe Tenured Radical okanogen John Amato GrannyGrump Chris Jones Kleinheider Clueless Emma Mike none@example.com David Weigel Evil Bender goyodelarosa
Disclaimer:
This text is automatically generated from different sources on the internet. It must be considered an experiment
The Shotgun Marc Emery s Farewell Tour comes to Calgary; libertarian leader prepares for jail - Marc Emery was in Calgary on Sunday night on the first stop in his Farewell Tour that will take the marijuana legalization activist across the country to s... 8 hours ago
Suzanne shows how it is done:
Whispers in the Loggia "Caritas" 101 - In prep for tomorrow's release of B16's first major contribution to the church's "social magisterium," the Mothership's Don Clemmer has posted a useful pri... 14 hours ago
Alana Kornfeld brings some great news:
Church-Going 'Martyr' Changes Dynamics of Abortion Debate Tuesday June 2, 2009 Dr. George Tiller's murder on Sunday (May 31) morning in the lobby of his Lutheran church counters the secular image of a late-term abortion provider, pinning him more as a churchgoing "martyr" than a godless murderer.
Kenneth Hynek notices:
In like manner, the issue of just what resides in the womb affects, or is related to, the dignity of each human person as well a human person. And much like proponents of the HRC s fail to see that their support of censorship undermines their own fundamental human right to speak their minds freely, proponents of abortion fail to see that their attempts to limit, abrogate, or deny the human dignity of the unborn undermine their ability to defend their own human dignity.
Similarly, mike volpe adds:
The debate started with a critical question from O'Reilly. Does Ms. Walsh believe that a fetus in the third trimester have any rights? It took her a long time to answer the question but ultimately she believes that no fetus has any rights at any time.
Tenured Radical is absolutely sure that:
As one of those foreigners in the US who wishes he could stay with his partner of many years, I also find the argument that my status could be regularized through other means a little tired. After all, the kind of immigration reform you suggest would require a fight against the very strong post-9/11 mentality that does not want porous national boundaries. I agree, though, that marriage should not be a solution to the immigration issue, and I wish this the immigration issue received more attention. However, if I had marriage as an option, I wouldn t hesitate to use it to my advantage (as several of my heterosexual colleagues at various universities have).
Despite the previous arguments, okanogen has many reasons to think otherwise:
Be the first on your block... ... to wear a Single Payer T-Shirt From Corrente! "You may think you’re insured... but wait ‘til the insurance companies change your policyâ€"or you change your job. Or lose it. Health care is a right. I support Single Payer." Half our massive profits go to start our micro-lending project; half go to keep the hamsters in kibble! Don't delay, because this Corrente collectible won't be on sale long! MR SUBLIMINAL Until somebody with better design skills than lambert steps up!
For this purpose, John Amato suggests:
Re: Rachel Maddow uncovers new threats on abortion clinics Thu, 06/11/2009 - 17:18 â€" Taarak Yes, that's how civil wars are started. Angry people are so easily manipulated. There's plenty to be angry about in the US right now, but most people don't know why they are angry. Give them an easy target and all of their anger and frustration then has a relief. Tell them who is at fault, and they will scream and yell right into self-destruction. Login or register to reply
GrannyGrump does not seem to agree with this. In his own words:
Tiller's Defense: Larry Said I Could: A look at what Tiller admitted on the stand in his trialTiller Trial: The Plot Thickens
Chris Jones comes with the facts:
Conservative evangelicals have gotten precious little for their support of Republicans in the past thirty years. Abortion remains legal. School Prayer is not allowed. Intelligent Design is not taught in public schools; evolution is. The only scraps they’ve been handed were ephemeral bans on embryonic stem-cell research and gay marriage. Still, on their biggest issues, Republicans have failed to deliver.
Kleinheider considers that:
Women s Health News » At Our Bodies Our Blog: Research Priorities, and More BS Posturing on Women s Health for Political Gain Posted 29 hours ago
Clueless Emma notices:
The Berean Call Travel UNIVERSAL HEALTHCARE Web/Tech WORDS OF THE WISE Archives June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 More...
Mike none@example.com considers that:
I certainly don't want abortion to be illegal. I have no patience for those who oppose all abortions for merely religious reasons. They are wasting their energy protesting when they could be using it to help the woman described above who wants a child but needs help with education and services. They could make a serious dent in the numbers of one type of abortion.
John Amato notices:
)O( Fri, 06/12/2009 - 05:46 â€" ysbaddaden Playboy was technically the first mass produced erotica although t and appeared in 1953, although the roots are ancient; the pill only became widely common in the 1960's and 70's (so you got the order criss-crossed), whereas drug use and infidelity has been around since time immemorial. Login or register to reply
David Weigel does not seem to agree with this. In his own words:
Joseph M. Scheidler , the national director of the Pro-Life Action League, argued that the reaction to Tiller â€" including the federal marshals â€" was “just a show,†and no different from how “the abortionists blame the pro-life movement for everything, anyway.â€
Evil Bender can't forget that:
I must admit, I can t actually bring myself to mock this. Roberts is actually opposed to laws designed to protect children from neglectful, desperate, or otherwise unfit parents. He s opposed to abortion, but also opposed to laws designed to make it safe for parents who cannot care for their children to give them up without fearing legal sanction. And he admits this while accusing reproductive rights advocates of being immoral for not caring about children.
goyodelarosa objects:
Collective Works Gallery Community Arts Council of Greater Victoria Community Marine Concepts LP (Victoria International Marina) CONSERVATIVES B. C.
Suzanne gives a bit of an idea about it:
ZENIT RSS-Newsfeed Time for G-8 to Re-make Broken Promises, Says Caritas [2009-07-06] - Risks Continued "Robbing the Poor to Feed the Rich" 22 hours ago
Sources:
Suzanne Suzanne Alana Kornfeld Kenneth Hynek mike volpe Tenured Radical okanogen John Amato GrannyGrump Chris Jones Kleinheider Clueless Emma Mike none@example.com David Weigel Evil Bender goyodelarosa
Disclaimer:
This text is automatically generated from different sources on the internet. It must be considered an experiment
Abortion From: David Jennings Suzanne Jean M. Heimann Mark P. Shea Constitutional Lawblogger Goyodelarosa Mike None@example.com Office@ecpcentre.org (ECP Centre) Eliza, AC360° Theotherryan Bradlaugh John Amato Roxana Hegeman Pandora Freemenow Sansego /26710388
David Jennings notices:
If your theory were valid that wouldn t be happening. and it’s yet another example where the only difference between liberals and conservatives is in what they want to use the force and power of government to do.
However, Suzanne thinks differently:
Northern Tequila Lynching the context - What to make of Jennifer Lynch's recent chastising of her censorship commission's critics? It reminds me of a conversation at my buddy's place earlier this... 2 weeks ago
Jean M. Heimann remembers that:
"Jean of Catholic Fire...provides so much informative content. She posts about pro-life issues and events, what happened 'on this day', biographies of saints, prayer intentions, and lots more each day. No matter what she's posting about, I can always come away each day feeling uplifted...and that's saying a lot for me, as I'm someone who often tries to avoid thinking about some of the political and other issues that she posts about. It must be her strong faith and trust in God, as well as her love, shining through her posts, that inspire me." Margaret Mary Myers , Reflections, Catholic BVI Readers, VIP Homeschooler.
Mark P. Shea is rather skeptical:
choose between the *blessing* and the *curse*. But what happened as soon asthey crossed the Jordan into the Promised Land? The *very next
constitutional lawblogger explains:
June 24, 2009Fourth Circuit Upholds Virginia "partial-birth" abortion banIn an en banc decision, the Fourth Circuit vacates its earlier panel decision and a district court decision concluding the Virginia state law was unconstitutional. In Richmond Medical Center for Women [and Dr. William Fitzhigh] v. Herring, decided today, full opinion available as pdf here , the en banc court stated:
Still not being convinced, goyodelarosa replies:
, DONALD DAVID SPRATT: PRO-LIFE PROTESTER, EVERY WOMAN'S HEALTH CLINIC EAST VANCOUVER, ABORTION ON DEMAND IN CANADA
Mike none@example.com is absolutely sure that:
Posted by: Pineyman | June 6, 2009 4:41 PM 7Phisrow - I have no idea what you are trying to say.
office@ecpcentre.org (ECP Centre) remembers that:
The media reported today that a federal appeals court upheld Virginia s partial-birth abortion law. Pro-aborts hate the term partial-birth abortion because it makes clear that the act is infanticide.
In response, Eliza, AC360° claims:
Powered by WordPress.com VIP
theotherryan remembers that:
I look at that the life has a soul, so if it is aborted, it goes to Heaven, no loss for for him/her, in my opinion. For me, the concern is the woman. Whether she believes its life or not, going thru an abortion is life changing.
However, Bradlaugh thinks differently:
Uncategorized
John Amato brings more details:
Indeed... Thu, 06/11/2009 - 20:22 â€" -Bricked- If I was involved in women's health in some form or another, I'd be applying for a CCL and my next purchase would be a .357 magnum. Login or register to reply
Roxana Hegeman says it all comes down to this:
The judge also said his decision was influenced by Roeder s conviction in 1996 of criminal possession of explosives, even though an appeals court later overturned the conviction because the search and seizure were illegal. Deputy District Attorney Ann Swegle said Roeder was found with a massive amount of firearms and weaponry and said Roeder said at the time that he planned to use it against an abortion clinic.
Mark P. Shea notices:
Obama Seems to Be Starting Some Sort of Catholic C... Manalive Fever is Sweeping the Nation! Most Embarrassing Michael Jackson Tribute Ever
Before going any further, pandora wants to get this straight:
14 PBaumbach // Jul 1, 2009 at 12:15 pm The extremists at this site oppose any support of personal choice for religion yet you want the Federal Government to provide dollars for something some people don’t agree with at all.
freemenow is rather skeptical:
No place is this more evident than when addressing the issue of abortion. Many genuinely see abortion as the taking of a life, and therefore feel obligated to speak out against it. They go up against those who perceive pro-lifers as trying to restrict the rights of women. This creates a tremendous clash. Yet this isn t the stark issue that some have made it out to be. The reality is that some on the left and on the right have used rhetoric to help radicalize the debate, making it a huge wedge issue. True equality and freedom for women will exist when pro-choice translates to free-choice and each woman is free to make her own decision without having it imposed on her.
In response, Sansego claims:
1997 Louis Freeh 1998 Russ Feingold 1999 Jesse Ventura 2000 John McCain 2001 Bill Maher
Sources:
David Jennings Suzanne Jean M. Heimann Mark P. Shea constitutional lawblogger goyodelarosa Mike none@example.com office@ecpcentre.org (ECP Centre) Eliza, AC360° theotherryan Bradlaugh John Amato Roxana Hegeman pandora freemenow Sansego
Disclaimer:
This text is automatically generated from different sources on the internet. It must be considered an experiment
If your theory were valid that wouldn t be happening. and it’s yet another example where the only difference between liberals and conservatives is in what they want to use the force and power of government to do.
However, Suzanne thinks differently:
Northern Tequila Lynching the context - What to make of Jennifer Lynch's recent chastising of her censorship commission's critics? It reminds me of a conversation at my buddy's place earlier this... 2 weeks ago
Jean M. Heimann remembers that:
"Jean of Catholic Fire...provides so much informative content. She posts about pro-life issues and events, what happened 'on this day', biographies of saints, prayer intentions, and lots more each day. No matter what she's posting about, I can always come away each day feeling uplifted...and that's saying a lot for me, as I'm someone who often tries to avoid thinking about some of the political and other issues that she posts about. It must be her strong faith and trust in God, as well as her love, shining through her posts, that inspire me." Margaret Mary Myers , Reflections, Catholic BVI Readers, VIP Homeschooler.
Mark P. Shea is rather skeptical:
choose between the *blessing* and the *curse*. But what happened as soon asthey crossed the Jordan into the Promised Land? The *very next
constitutional lawblogger explains:
June 24, 2009Fourth Circuit Upholds Virginia "partial-birth" abortion banIn an en banc decision, the Fourth Circuit vacates its earlier panel decision and a district court decision concluding the Virginia state law was unconstitutional. In Richmond Medical Center for Women [and Dr. William Fitzhigh] v. Herring, decided today, full opinion available as pdf here , the en banc court stated:
Still not being convinced, goyodelarosa replies:
, DONALD DAVID SPRATT: PRO-LIFE PROTESTER, EVERY WOMAN'S HEALTH CLINIC EAST VANCOUVER, ABORTION ON DEMAND IN CANADA
Mike none@example.com is absolutely sure that:
Posted by: Pineyman | June 6, 2009 4:41 PM 7Phisrow - I have no idea what you are trying to say.
office@ecpcentre.org (ECP Centre) remembers that:
The media reported today that a federal appeals court upheld Virginia s partial-birth abortion law. Pro-aborts hate the term partial-birth abortion because it makes clear that the act is infanticide.
In response, Eliza, AC360° claims:
Powered by WordPress.com VIP
theotherryan remembers that:
I look at that the life has a soul, so if it is aborted, it goes to Heaven, no loss for for him/her, in my opinion. For me, the concern is the woman. Whether she believes its life or not, going thru an abortion is life changing.
However, Bradlaugh thinks differently:
Uncategorized
John Amato brings more details:
Indeed... Thu, 06/11/2009 - 20:22 â€" -Bricked- If I was involved in women's health in some form or another, I'd be applying for a CCL and my next purchase would be a .357 magnum. Login or register to reply
Roxana Hegeman says it all comes down to this:
The judge also said his decision was influenced by Roeder s conviction in 1996 of criminal possession of explosives, even though an appeals court later overturned the conviction because the search and seizure were illegal. Deputy District Attorney Ann Swegle said Roeder was found with a massive amount of firearms and weaponry and said Roeder said at the time that he planned to use it against an abortion clinic.
Mark P. Shea notices:
Obama Seems to Be Starting Some Sort of Catholic C... Manalive Fever is Sweeping the Nation! Most Embarrassing Michael Jackson Tribute Ever
Before going any further, pandora wants to get this straight:
14 PBaumbach // Jul 1, 2009 at 12:15 pm The extremists at this site oppose any support of personal choice for religion yet you want the Federal Government to provide dollars for something some people don’t agree with at all.
freemenow is rather skeptical:
No place is this more evident than when addressing the issue of abortion. Many genuinely see abortion as the taking of a life, and therefore feel obligated to speak out against it. They go up against those who perceive pro-lifers as trying to restrict the rights of women. This creates a tremendous clash. Yet this isn t the stark issue that some have made it out to be. The reality is that some on the left and on the right have used rhetoric to help radicalize the debate, making it a huge wedge issue. True equality and freedom for women will exist when pro-choice translates to free-choice and each woman is free to make her own decision without having it imposed on her.
In response, Sansego claims:
1997 Louis Freeh 1998 Russ Feingold 1999 Jesse Ventura 2000 John McCain 2001 Bill Maher
Sources:
David Jennings Suzanne Jean M. Heimann Mark P. Shea constitutional lawblogger goyodelarosa Mike none@example.com office@ecpcentre.org (ECP Centre) Eliza, AC360° theotherryan Bradlaugh John Amato Roxana Hegeman pandora freemenow Sansego
Disclaimer:
This text is automatically generated from different sources on the internet. It must be considered an experiment
Abortion From: Suzanne Jeffrey L. Seglin Alana Kornfeld Nancy Keenan JDWolverton Kleinheider Booman Tribune PhDork Sansego David Jennings Jean M. Heimann Sarah Posner Bretcarbone Theotherryan Mike None@example.com Nomatterhowsmall Zachary Roth Briwo /26710393
Suzanne brings a word of caution:
Keep Life Legal Just to the Left of center - I belong to a church that is a worldwide ministry. I also work and volunteer at this ministry, proudly. My church believes in the Holy Word of God, no exce... 16 hours ago
As a result of that, Jeffrey L. Seglin belives:
Observations Banning Gifts from Drugmakers to Doctors - David Armstrong reported yesterday in The Wall Street Journal that new laws scheduled to take effect yesterday in Massachusetts and Vermont would ban pharm...
As Alana Kornfeld says:
"He was guilty of murder" No he wasn't, Kerri, and continually bearing false witness about him does not strengthen your case in the least. (Nor, quite frankly, does it make you much of a Christian yourself.)
Nancy Keenan brings some great news:
I deplore abortion...but...it's NOT MY BODY...period..and you evangelicals..that baby..straight shot to heaven...no crap or pain..just pearly gates...
JDWolverton shows how it is done:
Out of context statements that may support the anti-abortion position are reported without disclaimer. These statements are meant to inflame the anti-abortion crowd and get the sympathy of some pro-choice with restrictions folks. They don't care if the only way the statement can be verified is by violating HIPAA or a woman's 4th amendment rights. Taking quips like this from a medical record, out of context, leads to the kind of conclusions Fox News loves to promote and pro-choice advocates have difficulty challenging. It's ignorant, unsupportable and wrong. Yet, the anti-abortion crowd gets traction.
Kleinheider thinks that the problem is:
SayUncle » Crime guns Posted 14 hours ago The Coyote Chronicles » FGF- Dedicated To Well, You Know Who You Are Posted 14 hours ago
Booman Tribune objects:
BT's all-time best seller: PERMACULTURE: A Designers' Manual $79.95 * Sale: $59.95 Unequal Sisters : A Multicultural Reader in U.S. Women's History (Third Edition)
PhDork notices:
Double StandardsEducationEmpowerfulmentFashionFat Is A Feminist IssueFeminismGreat Male NarcissistsHollywoodLadylike Endeavors
Sansego brings more details:
Palin, on the other hand, would be seen as a quitter. Its difficult for quitters to win because Americans need to be certain that the leader is tough enough to withstand adversity. Its the reason why Abraham Lincoln remains our most admired presidents. Some might want to give a lady candidate some leeway for quitting, but even then, it only hurts her candidacy. She would especially pale in comparison to Hillary Clinton, who never quit no matter how heated the criticism in the press got. Hillary is plenty tough and if things go well for her as Secretary of State (and a possible V.P. slot in 2012), she could still become president in 2016 if she wanted another run. By contrast, can people really trust that Palin wouldn't bail on the American people if the going got too tough for her in the White House?
David Jennings comes with a new idea:
Pizza God on June 30th, 2009 at 4:19 pm Good questions and hopefully she will answer those in the next few weeks.
Jean M. Heimann points out another thing aside from that:
Catholic Fire What's up with Sarah Palin? 9 hours ago Catholic Pillow Fight I Am Being Stalked by the Sacred Heart of Jesus 3 weeks ago
Sarah Posner has another idea:
In a 2008 press teleconference co-sponsored by CACG and Sojourners, Kelley stated that she supported state-imposed restrictions on abortion, such as waiting periods and informed consent. In her 2008 book, A Nation for All , co-written with Chris Korzen , Kelley wrote, "Each abortion constitutes a direct attack on human life, and so we have a special moral obligation to end or reduce the practice of abortion to the greatest extent possible."
In response, bretcarbone claims:
Don t Believe the Hype About Fox News Ratings Operating Room Joe: No Go On "Public Option" The Agony Of Defeat: Conservative Media React To S...
For example, theotherryan considers:
Our Last Chance Disturbing Potential Law An Interesting Conversation on Ethics. Guest post about kids and knives and car parts--
Mike none@example.com comes with a new idea:
These are the two things I want you, please, to remember -- abortion is a blessing and our work is not done. Let me hear you say it: abortion is a blessing and our work is not done. Abortion is a blessing and our work is not done. Abortion is a blessing and our work is not done.
nomatterhowsmall sees it this way:
VA Court Upholds Ban on Partial Birth Abortion 6-5 by nomatterhowsmall on Fri 26 Jun 2009 02:35 PM EDT | Permanent Link | Cosmos
Having that in mind, Zachary Roth wonders:
Scarborough is many things noxious - just don't read as much into this situation - a lot of it seems to be ordinary course of business in criminal law - in other words not something out of which much will grow.
Despite the previous arguments, Kleinheider has many reasons to think otherwise:
Liberadio(!) » Why Al Franken Won Posted 31 hours ago TaxingTennessee » DC Govt Jobs Hiring Boom goes into high Gear Posted 31 hours ago
However, briwo thinks differently:
#10 | Posted by herm at 2009-06-16 09:30 AM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose) Funny Newsworthy Offensive Abusive lock her up.
Sources:
Suzanne Jeffrey L. Seglin Alana Kornfeld Nancy Keenan JDWolverton Kleinheider Booman Tribune PhDork Sansego David Jennings Jean M. Heimann Sarah Posner bretcarbone theotherryan Mike none@example.com nomatterhowsmall Zachary Roth briwo
Disclaimer:
This text is automatically generated from different sources on the internet. It must be considered an experiment
Keep Life Legal Just to the Left of center - I belong to a church that is a worldwide ministry. I also work and volunteer at this ministry, proudly. My church believes in the Holy Word of God, no exce... 16 hours ago
As a result of that, Jeffrey L. Seglin belives:
Observations Banning Gifts from Drugmakers to Doctors - David Armstrong reported yesterday in The Wall Street Journal that new laws scheduled to take effect yesterday in Massachusetts and Vermont would ban pharm...
As Alana Kornfeld says:
"He was guilty of murder" No he wasn't, Kerri, and continually bearing false witness about him does not strengthen your case in the least. (Nor, quite frankly, does it make you much of a Christian yourself.)
Nancy Keenan brings some great news:
I deplore abortion...but...it's NOT MY BODY...period..and you evangelicals..that baby..straight shot to heaven...no crap or pain..just pearly gates...
JDWolverton shows how it is done:
Out of context statements that may support the anti-abortion position are reported without disclaimer. These statements are meant to inflame the anti-abortion crowd and get the sympathy of some pro-choice with restrictions folks. They don't care if the only way the statement can be verified is by violating HIPAA or a woman's 4th amendment rights. Taking quips like this from a medical record, out of context, leads to the kind of conclusions Fox News loves to promote and pro-choice advocates have difficulty challenging. It's ignorant, unsupportable and wrong. Yet, the anti-abortion crowd gets traction.
Kleinheider thinks that the problem is:
SayUncle » Crime guns Posted 14 hours ago The Coyote Chronicles » FGF- Dedicated To Well, You Know Who You Are Posted 14 hours ago
Booman Tribune objects:
BT's all-time best seller: PERMACULTURE: A Designers' Manual $79.95 * Sale: $59.95 Unequal Sisters : A Multicultural Reader in U.S. Women's History (Third Edition)
PhDork notices:
Double StandardsEducationEmpowerfulmentFashionFat Is A Feminist IssueFeminismGreat Male NarcissistsHollywoodLadylike Endeavors
Sansego brings more details:
Palin, on the other hand, would be seen as a quitter. Its difficult for quitters to win because Americans need to be certain that the leader is tough enough to withstand adversity. Its the reason why Abraham Lincoln remains our most admired presidents. Some might want to give a lady candidate some leeway for quitting, but even then, it only hurts her candidacy. She would especially pale in comparison to Hillary Clinton, who never quit no matter how heated the criticism in the press got. Hillary is plenty tough and if things go well for her as Secretary of State (and a possible V.P. slot in 2012), she could still become president in 2016 if she wanted another run. By contrast, can people really trust that Palin wouldn't bail on the American people if the going got too tough for her in the White House?
David Jennings comes with a new idea:
Pizza God on June 30th, 2009 at 4:19 pm Good questions and hopefully she will answer those in the next few weeks.
Jean M. Heimann points out another thing aside from that:
Catholic Fire What's up with Sarah Palin? 9 hours ago Catholic Pillow Fight I Am Being Stalked by the Sacred Heart of Jesus 3 weeks ago
Sarah Posner has another idea:
In a 2008 press teleconference co-sponsored by CACG and Sojourners, Kelley stated that she supported state-imposed restrictions on abortion, such as waiting periods and informed consent. In her 2008 book, A Nation for All , co-written with Chris Korzen , Kelley wrote, "Each abortion constitutes a direct attack on human life, and so we have a special moral obligation to end or reduce the practice of abortion to the greatest extent possible."
In response, bretcarbone claims:
Don t Believe the Hype About Fox News Ratings Operating Room Joe: No Go On "Public Option" The Agony Of Defeat: Conservative Media React To S...
For example, theotherryan considers:
Our Last Chance Disturbing Potential Law An Interesting Conversation on Ethics. Guest post about kids and knives and car parts--
Mike none@example.com comes with a new idea:
These are the two things I want you, please, to remember -- abortion is a blessing and our work is not done. Let me hear you say it: abortion is a blessing and our work is not done. Abortion is a blessing and our work is not done. Abortion is a blessing and our work is not done.
nomatterhowsmall sees it this way:
VA Court Upholds Ban on Partial Birth Abortion 6-5 by nomatterhowsmall on Fri 26 Jun 2009 02:35 PM EDT | Permanent Link | Cosmos
Having that in mind, Zachary Roth wonders:
Scarborough is many things noxious - just don't read as much into this situation - a lot of it seems to be ordinary course of business in criminal law - in other words not something out of which much will grow.
Despite the previous arguments, Kleinheider has many reasons to think otherwise:
Liberadio(!) » Why Al Franken Won Posted 31 hours ago TaxingTennessee » DC Govt Jobs Hiring Boom goes into high Gear Posted 31 hours ago
However, briwo thinks differently:
#10 | Posted by herm at 2009-06-16 09:30 AM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose) Funny Newsworthy Offensive Abusive lock her up.
Sources:
Suzanne Jeffrey L. Seglin Alana Kornfeld Nancy Keenan JDWolverton Kleinheider Booman Tribune PhDork Sansego David Jennings Jean M. Heimann Sarah Posner bretcarbone theotherryan Mike none@example.com nomatterhowsmall Zachary Roth briwo
Disclaimer:
This text is automatically generated from different sources on the internet. It must be considered an experiment
Abortion From: Mytheos_Holt Amy Dempsey DeBeauxOs Terry Krepel Ed Morrissey Briwo Bob Hooper Suzanne Jean M. Heimann Theotherryan Jim Williams Erin Manning Bradlaugh Booman Tribune Blackandred Ta-Nehisi Coates Aspen Baker Tenured Radical /26710392
Mytheos_Holt is absolutely sure that:
All law is moral? Submitted by dab8709 on Sat, 06/27/2009 - 13:28. Seems like some of you are forgetting about that whole Renaissance thing western civilization had awhile back.
Meanwhile, Amy Dempsey came up with this idea:
Anti-Choice Candidate Spotlight: Barbara Comstock (R-34) July 2: State Bill Colorado: New Personhood Ballot Drive Launched
In response, deBeauxOs claims:
rusty idols slap upside the head stage left terrible depths the black ewe the galloping beaver
Terry Krepel explains:
-- WND also published in 2002 a seven-part series by Jack Cashill claiming that James Kopp was framed for the 1998 death of abortion doctor Barnett Slepian. Cashill accused the Clinton administration of being "determined ... to protect the abortion industry" and of having "open hostility to the pro-life movement" (and Hillary Clinton in particular of having "made the department into a formidable feminist stronghold"), painted Kopp as having "an almost Gandhian devotion to non-violence and passive resistance," accused officials of singling out Kopp as part of "a fishing expedition," claimed that because Slepian was a "mediocre student" and performing abortions takes "no great talent" he "fit the classic stereotype of the abortion doctor," asserted that evidence against Kopp was planted, and even suggested that "the pro-choice side had a much greater motive to kill Slepian than did the pro-life side" because Slepian was allegedly considering leaving his abort ion practice. Six months later, Kopp pleaded guilty to killing Slepian; Cashill has yet to correct his articles or apologize for them.
For this purpose, Ed Morrissey suggests:
Besides, I really don t wish to meet the person who would want to see her child s life ended to save her own hide. I seriously doubt those people come along very often.
While it may be true, briwo thinks:
#29 | Posted by jpw at 2009-06-16 12:03 PM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose) Funny Newsworthy Offensive Abusive "As to 'proliars' - what would they (lie) about? ... they are really pro-death." The pro-liars lie about everything connected with reproductive rights, Cidney, if they think it will do the fetus some good. The choice side, Cidney, REALLY cares about life, lives of live women. herm
Thinking that's not all, Bob Hooper adds:
Want to browse more blogs? Try our table of contents to find articles under specific topics or headings. Or you might find interesting entries by looking through the complete archives too. Stay around awhile. We're glad you're here.
Suzanne notices:
CHP Skeena-Bulkley Ezra Levant comments on Jennifer Lynch's Speech - ...It was the speech of an angry bigot... to read Ezra's lengthy analysis of Jennifer's attempt to defend... 9 hours ago
Having that in mind, Jean M. Heimann wonders:
St. Cyril of Alexandria It s Our 17th Wedding Anniversary! St. JosemarÃa Escrivá de Balaguer NC Remembers Sterilization Program; Margaret Sange... YouTube Removes New Undercover Video of Planned Pa...
For this reason, theotherryan says:
First the big question pops up in my head, WHY DO WE CARE SO MUCH ABOUT ABORTION?The best answer I can think of is that abortion is to the liberals (well most of them) what gun rights are to conservatives except on crack. It is a litmus test for liberals to determine if a candidate for anything (even county dog catcher) has a similar view point as them. It is also a rallying cry for conservatives (well most of them) to come together against. To make the whole thing even more complicated it involves religion which liberals tend to hate and conservatives tend to be passionate about. People can't talk about abortion or religion in a rational manner. Don't have a good reason for why I am trying except that I spent a whole bunch of time thinking about this.
Despite the previous arguments, J im Williams has many reasons to think otherwise:
On Saturday, abortion opponents said that instead of holding their service at the clinic they would place 1,500 flowers at a local hospital and a location near their own national headquarters.
Despite the previous arguments, Erin Manning has many reasons to think otherwise:
As a matter of moral philosophy, this makes a certain sense. Either a fetus has a claim to life or it doesn't. The circumstances of its conception and the state of its health shouldn't enter into the equation.
Bradlaugh remembers that:
Number 2 obviously wasn t in play until 1973. Â Number 3 only really pushed to the front when RC intellectuals got to critical mass among conservative propagandists, which I think was ca. late 1980s. (I don t have Damon Linker s book to hand.) Prior to that, number 1 was pretty much it.
In addition to this, Booman Tribune states:
Featured by Keith Olbermann , New (Powell's Sale): Rogue State: A Guide to the World's Only Superpower by William Blum (whose other books merit serious consideration)
blackandred notices:
Meet Senator Jim Demint: The Coup Apologist (58 reads) Comparisons Between Venezuela & Honduras: Spinning the Honduran Coup (191 reads)
deBeauxOs remembers that:
DAMMIT JANET!: Spin and shrieeekkk watch. Sunday, June 21, 2009 Spin and shrieeekkk watch. Pro-choice supporters advocates have allowed to a certain extent pro-lies zealots to set the terms of an 'abortion vs no abortion' orthodoxy.
Ta-Nehisi Coates does a quick recap:
I totally disagree. If a fetus were property, I could sell it. I could announce to the right group that I wanted to have an abortion, but if someone pays me enough, I'd bring the pregnancy to term and let that person adopt the baby. I guess I don't know, really, whether that would be illegal, but I'd be a little shocked if it were.
While it may be true, Aspen Baker thinks:
There are More Comments on this Thread. Click Here To See them All - + mergina I'm a Fan of mergina I'm a fan of this user permalink My dear, the bottom line is NO ONE, especially a MAN, has the right to tell a woman what to do with her body. Reply Favorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:06 AM on 07/01/2009
Tenured Radical comes with the facts:
I had missed it that the federal Department of Justice (DoJ) had filed a brief supporting the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act
Sources:
Mytheos_Holt Amy Dempsey deBeauxOs Terry Krepel Ed Morrissey briwo Bob Hooper Suzanne Jean M. Heimann theotherryan Jim Williams Erin Manning Bradlaugh Booman Tribune blackandred Ta-Nehisi Coates Aspen Baker Tenured Radical
Disclaimer:
This text is automatically generated from different sources on the internet. It must be considered an experiment
All law is moral? Submitted by dab8709 on Sat, 06/27/2009 - 13:28. Seems like some of you are forgetting about that whole Renaissance thing western civilization had awhile back.
Meanwhile, Amy Dempsey came up with this idea:
Anti-Choice Candidate Spotlight: Barbara Comstock (R-34) July 2: State Bill Colorado: New Personhood Ballot Drive Launched
In response, deBeauxOs claims:
rusty idols slap upside the head stage left terrible depths the black ewe the galloping beaver
Terry Krepel explains:
-- WND also published in 2002 a seven-part series by Jack Cashill claiming that James Kopp was framed for the 1998 death of abortion doctor Barnett Slepian. Cashill accused the Clinton administration of being "determined ... to protect the abortion industry" and of having "open hostility to the pro-life movement" (and Hillary Clinton in particular of having "made the department into a formidable feminist stronghold"), painted Kopp as having "an almost Gandhian devotion to non-violence and passive resistance," accused officials of singling out Kopp as part of "a fishing expedition," claimed that because Slepian was a "mediocre student" and performing abortions takes "no great talent" he "fit the classic stereotype of the abortion doctor," asserted that evidence against Kopp was planted, and even suggested that "the pro-choice side had a much greater motive to kill Slepian than did the pro-life side" because Slepian was allegedly considering leaving his abort ion practice. Six months later, Kopp pleaded guilty to killing Slepian; Cashill has yet to correct his articles or apologize for them.
For this purpose, Ed Morrissey suggests:
Besides, I really don t wish to meet the person who would want to see her child s life ended to save her own hide. I seriously doubt those people come along very often.
While it may be true, briwo thinks:
#29 | Posted by jpw at 2009-06-16 12:03 PM | Reply | Flag: Flag: (Choose) Funny Newsworthy Offensive Abusive "As to 'proliars' - what would they (lie) about? ... they are really pro-death." The pro-liars lie about everything connected with reproductive rights, Cidney, if they think it will do the fetus some good. The choice side, Cidney, REALLY cares about life, lives of live women. herm
Thinking that's not all, Bob Hooper adds:
Want to browse more blogs? Try our table of contents to find articles under specific topics or headings. Or you might find interesting entries by looking through the complete archives too. Stay around awhile. We're glad you're here.
Suzanne notices:
CHP Skeena-Bulkley Ezra Levant comments on Jennifer Lynch's Speech - ...It was the speech of an angry bigot... to read Ezra's lengthy analysis of Jennifer's attempt to defend... 9 hours ago
Having that in mind, Jean M. Heimann wonders:
St. Cyril of Alexandria It s Our 17th Wedding Anniversary! St. JosemarÃa Escrivá de Balaguer NC Remembers Sterilization Program; Margaret Sange... YouTube Removes New Undercover Video of Planned Pa...
For this reason, theotherryan says:
First the big question pops up in my head, WHY DO WE CARE SO MUCH ABOUT ABORTION?The best answer I can think of is that abortion is to the liberals (well most of them) what gun rights are to conservatives except on crack. It is a litmus test for liberals to determine if a candidate for anything (even county dog catcher) has a similar view point as them. It is also a rallying cry for conservatives (well most of them) to come together against. To make the whole thing even more complicated it involves religion which liberals tend to hate and conservatives tend to be passionate about. People can't talk about abortion or religion in a rational manner. Don't have a good reason for why I am trying except that I spent a whole bunch of time thinking about this.
Despite the previous arguments, J im Williams has many reasons to think otherwise:
On Saturday, abortion opponents said that instead of holding their service at the clinic they would place 1,500 flowers at a local hospital and a location near their own national headquarters.
Despite the previous arguments, Erin Manning has many reasons to think otherwise:
As a matter of moral philosophy, this makes a certain sense. Either a fetus has a claim to life or it doesn't. The circumstances of its conception and the state of its health shouldn't enter into the equation.
Bradlaugh remembers that:
Number 2 obviously wasn t in play until 1973. Â Number 3 only really pushed to the front when RC intellectuals got to critical mass among conservative propagandists, which I think was ca. late 1980s. (I don t have Damon Linker s book to hand.) Prior to that, number 1 was pretty much it.
In addition to this, Booman Tribune states:
Featured by Keith Olbermann , New (Powell's Sale): Rogue State: A Guide to the World's Only Superpower by William Blum (whose other books merit serious consideration)
blackandred notices:
Meet Senator Jim Demint: The Coup Apologist (58 reads) Comparisons Between Venezuela & Honduras: Spinning the Honduran Coup (191 reads)
deBeauxOs remembers that:
DAMMIT JANET!: Spin and shrieeekkk watch. Sunday, June 21, 2009 Spin and shrieeekkk watch. Pro-choice supporters advocates have allowed to a certain extent pro-lies zealots to set the terms of an 'abortion vs no abortion' orthodoxy.
Ta-Nehisi Coates does a quick recap:
I totally disagree. If a fetus were property, I could sell it. I could announce to the right group that I wanted to have an abortion, but if someone pays me enough, I'd bring the pregnancy to term and let that person adopt the baby. I guess I don't know, really, whether that would be illegal, but I'd be a little shocked if it were.
While it may be true, Aspen Baker thinks:
There are More Comments on this Thread. Click Here To See them All - + mergina I'm a Fan of mergina I'm a fan of this user permalink My dear, the bottom line is NO ONE, especially a MAN, has the right to tell a woman what to do with her body. Reply Favorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:06 AM on 07/01/2009
Tenured Radical comes with the facts:
I had missed it that the federal Department of Justice (DoJ) had filed a brief supporting the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act
Sources:
Mytheos_Holt Amy Dempsey deBeauxOs Terry Krepel Ed Morrissey briwo Bob Hooper Suzanne Jean M. Heimann theotherryan Jim Williams Erin Manning Bradlaugh Booman Tribune blackandred Ta-Nehisi Coates Aspen Baker Tenured Radical
Disclaimer:
This text is automatically generated from different sources on the internet. It must be considered an experiment
Abortion From: ZIP Tim Graham Bretcarbone Roy Edroso Alana Kornfeld Jeffrey L. Seglin Jen Nedeau Ta-Nehisi Coates Bob Hooper Aspen Baker Apostate David Jennings Sherry Tyree Evil Bender Nightprowlkitty Jayne Lyn Stahl Briwo /26710390
ZIP points out another thing aside from that:
I hope that Poland, as one of the last states in Europe to have any respect for a Christian religion kicks AI squarely in the balls over this. I wonder how hard AI works to ensure abortion rights in predominately muslim countries as they are the ones with an oversupply of uneducated and violent young males? Posted by: Athena | June 28, 2009 at 09:37 PM
Tim Graham brings more details:
And, finally, each time a clip appeared on the "NOW" program from "The O’Reilly Factor" with Juan Williams on screen, I cringed. I admire Mr. Williams for his scholarly writing and his reporting on NPR. Fox News president Roger Ailes knows he is exploiting the credibility that Mr. Williams has built at NPR and carries with him to Fox. I wonder if Williams ever thinks that he is squandering a measure of that credibility by his continued appearances with Bill O’Reilly.
bretcarbone intervenes and adds:
Allred said police would investigate threats on either side of the controversial abortion issue."That s our job ... to take a fair and impartial role on this," he said.
In other words, Roy Edroso puts it this way:
Ross Douthat: Drop Abortion Rights and Your Doctors Will Be Allowed to LiveBy Roy Edroso in Exploring the Right Wing Blogosphere , Featured
Alana Kornfeld comes with the facts:
If Terry is the public (or at least the loudest) voice in the anti-abortion movement, that's a problem because Tiller's death "shows the consequence of the inflated language of murder," she said.
Jeffrey L. Seglin can't forget that:
4 comments: Bill Jacobson said... Absolutely not! In no other industry do we hold surviving family members obligated to continue a deceased s work. Is it not ironic that we are asking whether surviving members "have the right to choose" whether or not to continue when that very mantra that runs their industry?
Despite the previous arguments, Jeffrey L. Seglin has many reasons to think otherwise:
Writers for a well-known wine-industry newsletter, The Wine Advocate, had accepted paid trips to cover the industry.
In other words, Jen Nedeau puts it this way:
Furthermore, funding restrictions save lives by reducing the number of abortions. The Guttmacher Policy Review, a leading pro-choice research organization noted "that about one third of women who would have had an abortion if support were available carried their pregnancies to term when the abortion fund was unavailable."
In contrast, Ta-Nehisi Coates replies:
Ricky Bobby June 5, 2009 8:40 PM I think the critical thing to take away from all this is to realize how magnificent our union has become to where something like the Tiller murder is a huge deal and can shift entire political agendas. 100+ years ago, you are right, it wouldn't even be on the violence radar.
Bob Hooper scans the other's answers and reply:
The thesis: "By seizing on the twin themes of Christianity and patriotism, of moral values at home and strength in the global war on terror, Rove. Inc. found a formula than had reshaped the American electorate. " p. 213.
As a result of that, Aspen Baker belives:
HUFFPOST'S BIG NEWS PAGES Colombian Soccer Player Kills Fan For Calling Him "Lousy" Colombia Coffee May 'Reverse Alzheimer's' Health Conan's "Tonight Show" Audience A Decade Younger Than Leno's Conan O'Brien Former Gitmo Detainee Launches Legal Fight To Stop US From Destroying Alleged Torture Photos Guantánamo Bay Obama's Regulatory Plan Would Trim Back Financial Powerhouses Citibank Obama Meeting With Medvedev Monday, To Discuss Arms Control Russia Tom, Katie And Suri Go To The Theater (PHOTOS) Photo Galleries Jon & Kate Gosselin Together For July 4 Jon & Kate Plus 8 Katharine Weymouth Apologizes For Paid Salon Plan Wash Post more big news pages
apostate objects:
Abortion is morally neutral, in my view, because no person is affected by it except the woman making the decision. She is best placed, therefore, to make that decision for herself according to her own moral lights. I m okay with a woman deciding she can t morally justify an abortion. I m also okay with a woman deciding her moral values aren t contradicted by ending a pregnancy.
As a result of that, David Jennings belives:
Hamous on June 29th, 2009 at 8:45 pm How would everyone here feel about getting the State out of the marriage business altogether? Would it be ok for 1st cousins to marry? What about brother and sister? Mother and son? Father and dog ?
However, Sherry Tyree states that:
D. Walker 11:37 am July 4th, 2009 What perturbs me most about the pro-choice crowd is their belief that abortion is about reproductive choice and therefore elective abortions are a right they are entitled to. The reality is that medically performed abortions are in fact the premeditated termination of a reproductive choice! Denying a reproductive choice the pursuit of happiness goes completely against the very foundation of our nation. Every choice we make in life has its consequences. If we take away the consequences, we end up with an immature, irresponsible citizenry that justifies manslaughter for convenience. Stan 11:33 pm July 4th, 2009
As Evil Bender says:
*In fact, Renew America may have a PhD in Horribleness .
Nightprowlkitty considers that:
Under George W. Bush, the faith-based centers didn't play a policy role. But Obama has expanded the faith-based project to include a policy side, and one of its chief goals is to reduce the need for abortion. I have opposed this, because reproductive health is a public health, not a religious issue. Also problematic: It is counterproductive for Obama to appoint someone who disagrees with the administration's stance. Obama finds himself now in the difficult position of having elevated the importance of religion to making policy, and having appointed a religious figure whose opinions on policy conflict with his.
In other words, Jayne Lyn Stahl puts it this way:
For more than twenty years, George Tiller, and his clinic, have been the target of choice opponents. This was not the first time the Kansas physician was the victim of a barbaric, and heinous, act of violence, but it was the last time.
As briwo says:
"Those that care about life oppose abortion, those that do not care about life are for it. The rest is semantical bs."
Sources:
ZIP Tim Graham bretcarbone Roy Edroso Alana Kornfeld Jeffrey L. Seglin Jen Nedeau Ta-Nehisi Coates Bob Hooper Aspen Baker apostate David Jennings Sherry Tyree Evil Bender Nightprowlkitty Jayne Lyn Stahl briwo
Disclaimer:
This text is automatically generated from different sources on the internet. It must be considered an experiment
I hope that Poland, as one of the last states in Europe to have any respect for a Christian religion kicks AI squarely in the balls over this. I wonder how hard AI works to ensure abortion rights in predominately muslim countries as they are the ones with an oversupply of uneducated and violent young males? Posted by: Athena | June 28, 2009 at 09:37 PM
Tim Graham brings more details:
And, finally, each time a clip appeared on the "NOW" program from "The O’Reilly Factor" with Juan Williams on screen, I cringed. I admire Mr. Williams for his scholarly writing and his reporting on NPR. Fox News president Roger Ailes knows he is exploiting the credibility that Mr. Williams has built at NPR and carries with him to Fox. I wonder if Williams ever thinks that he is squandering a measure of that credibility by his continued appearances with Bill O’Reilly.
bretcarbone intervenes and adds:
Allred said police would investigate threats on either side of the controversial abortion issue."That s our job ... to take a fair and impartial role on this," he said.
In other words, Roy Edroso puts it this way:
Ross Douthat: Drop Abortion Rights and Your Doctors Will Be Allowed to LiveBy Roy Edroso in Exploring the Right Wing Blogosphere , Featured
Alana Kornfeld comes with the facts:
If Terry is the public (or at least the loudest) voice in the anti-abortion movement, that's a problem because Tiller's death "shows the consequence of the inflated language of murder," she said.
Jeffrey L. Seglin can't forget that:
4 comments: Bill Jacobson said... Absolutely not! In no other industry do we hold surviving family members obligated to continue a deceased s work. Is it not ironic that we are asking whether surviving members "have the right to choose" whether or not to continue when that very mantra that runs their industry?
Despite the previous arguments, Jeffrey L. Seglin has many reasons to think otherwise:
Writers for a well-known wine-industry newsletter, The Wine Advocate, had accepted paid trips to cover the industry.
In other words, Jen Nedeau puts it this way:
Furthermore, funding restrictions save lives by reducing the number of abortions. The Guttmacher Policy Review, a leading pro-choice research organization noted "that about one third of women who would have had an abortion if support were available carried their pregnancies to term when the abortion fund was unavailable."
In contrast, Ta-Nehisi Coates replies:
Ricky Bobby June 5, 2009 8:40 PM I think the critical thing to take away from all this is to realize how magnificent our union has become to where something like the Tiller murder is a huge deal and can shift entire political agendas. 100+ years ago, you are right, it wouldn't even be on the violence radar.
Bob Hooper scans the other's answers and reply:
The thesis: "By seizing on the twin themes of Christianity and patriotism, of moral values at home and strength in the global war on terror, Rove. Inc. found a formula than had reshaped the American electorate. " p. 213.
As a result of that, Aspen Baker belives:
HUFFPOST'S BIG NEWS PAGES Colombian Soccer Player Kills Fan For Calling Him "Lousy" Colombia Coffee May 'Reverse Alzheimer's' Health Conan's "Tonight Show" Audience A Decade Younger Than Leno's Conan O'Brien Former Gitmo Detainee Launches Legal Fight To Stop US From Destroying Alleged Torture Photos Guantánamo Bay Obama's Regulatory Plan Would Trim Back Financial Powerhouses Citibank Obama Meeting With Medvedev Monday, To Discuss Arms Control Russia Tom, Katie And Suri Go To The Theater (PHOTOS) Photo Galleries Jon & Kate Gosselin Together For July 4 Jon & Kate Plus 8 Katharine Weymouth Apologizes For Paid Salon Plan Wash Post more big news pages
apostate objects:
Abortion is morally neutral, in my view, because no person is affected by it except the woman making the decision. She is best placed, therefore, to make that decision for herself according to her own moral lights. I m okay with a woman deciding she can t morally justify an abortion. I m also okay with a woman deciding her moral values aren t contradicted by ending a pregnancy.
As a result of that, David Jennings belives:
Hamous on June 29th, 2009 at 8:45 pm How would everyone here feel about getting the State out of the marriage business altogether? Would it be ok for 1st cousins to marry? What about brother and sister? Mother and son? Father and dog ?
However, Sherry Tyree states that:
D. Walker 11:37 am July 4th, 2009 What perturbs me most about the pro-choice crowd is their belief that abortion is about reproductive choice and therefore elective abortions are a right they are entitled to. The reality is that medically performed abortions are in fact the premeditated termination of a reproductive choice! Denying a reproductive choice the pursuit of happiness goes completely against the very foundation of our nation. Every choice we make in life has its consequences. If we take away the consequences, we end up with an immature, irresponsible citizenry that justifies manslaughter for convenience. Stan 11:33 pm July 4th, 2009
As Evil Bender says:
*In fact, Renew America may have a PhD in Horribleness .
Nightprowlkitty considers that:
Under George W. Bush, the faith-based centers didn't play a policy role. But Obama has expanded the faith-based project to include a policy side, and one of its chief goals is to reduce the need for abortion. I have opposed this, because reproductive health is a public health, not a religious issue. Also problematic: It is counterproductive for Obama to appoint someone who disagrees with the administration's stance. Obama finds himself now in the difficult position of having elevated the importance of religion to making policy, and having appointed a religious figure whose opinions on policy conflict with his.
In other words, Jayne Lyn Stahl puts it this way:
For more than twenty years, George Tiller, and his clinic, have been the target of choice opponents. This was not the first time the Kansas physician was the victim of a barbaric, and heinous, act of violence, but it was the last time.
As briwo says:
"Those that care about life oppose abortion, those that do not care about life are for it. The rest is semantical bs."
Sources:
ZIP Tim Graham bretcarbone Roy Edroso Alana Kornfeld Jeffrey L. Seglin Jen Nedeau Ta-Nehisi Coates Bob Hooper Aspen Baker apostate David Jennings Sherry Tyree Evil Bender Nightprowlkitty Jayne Lyn Stahl briwo
Disclaimer:
This text is automatically generated from different sources on the internet. It must be considered an experiment
Friday, August 14, 2009
Abortion From: Zachary Roth PhDork Gloria Feldt Bob Hooper Suzanne Clueless Emma Sansego Tim Graham Theotherryan The Blogprof The Independent Mike None@example.com Thor David Jennings /26693526
Having that in mind, Zachary Roth wonders:
I would like to point out, before I address this, that this question not only goes far beyond Zach's framing - which was 'why did Scar get involved?' but conflates two things. This is like asking for a theory on the development of the universe that also - for believability's sake - explains why the universe should develop in a way that's just perfect for us. First, it's not perfect for us, 99.9999% of the universe would kill us instantly if we were there, and second, because we're a result of it, rather than it being tailored to us. Same basic thing here.
PhDork gives a bit of an idea about it:
PhDork says: June 23, 2009 at 2:09 pm SallyRidden: Women, even women who are pressured by their societies to denigrate/destroy other females, win out over female fetuses. I m only advocating abortion as something to celebrate as much as I m advocating appendectomy as something to celebrate. Both are medical procedures that sometimes need to happen. When they are needed and do happen, that s a good thing. It is good for people to have the health care they need.
In response, Gloria Feldt claims:
reproductive rights or guilt-tripping. All the faux-concern, hand-waving and rationalizing is just apologetics for the unpalatable fact that being anti-abortion means you expect some other women to go through a pregnancy and childbirth they don't want, in order to coddle your beliefs.
Still being unsure, Bob Hooper asks:
is-is : Great blog post Bob! Your brutally honest, graphic pin-point analysis with a certain smug edge to it, on hotly debated topics such as embryonic genocide puts a tingly feeling in my legs. There are so many ignorant and arrogant people out there today who just don’t understand science and politics like you do. Go Bob, keep on keeping us entertained! Posted by is-is | June 20, 2009 1:37 PM Posted on June 20, 2009 13:37
Suzanne thinks about it:
SoCon Or Bust Full Steam Ahead - It s good to see that there are some readers who are moving forward with Campaign Pro Vida : John, I have written to my bishop, and some of my friends hav... 1 day ago
Similarly, Clueless Emma adds:
"Abortions reduced by 300,000 a year during the Clinton years, stayed flat or increased during the Bush years, and if they resume their reductions during the Obama years, then many consistently pro-life people like me will conclude that we should judge administrations not by their words but by their fruits," Stassen triumphantly concluded in a recent piece for Sojourners, Jim Wallis s website for liberal religionists.
Sansego shows how it is done:
With the photo above, we can breathe a sigh of relief that Palin's resignation will mean no possibility of higher office for this queen of ignorance. If she still harbours the belief that she can become president after serving only half a term as governor of a low-population state on the margins of American culture and political life, she truly is more delusional than I previously gave credit for. 2012 is safe from the likes of Palin.
For this reason, Tim Graham says:
Bode also thought a more balanced show would have included a former pro-lifer who now denounces his role in the "Republican Party’s hate machine."
However, theotherryan thinks differently:
This is what I meant: when the culture is against something, no law is really necessary. When the culture is for something, no law is possible.
Still not being convinced, The blogprof replies:
The Other Club ...our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor. 6 hours ago The Rougblog Politics is not for the Common Man 1 hour ago
But The Independent has a different opinion:
Palin did not help herself by delivering what appeared to be a largely off-the-cuff address on Friday, in which it took 11 minutes to get round to mentioning she would resign. The speech looks set to become another Palin internet classic, alongside her catastrophic interviews with Katie Couric during the campaign, the post-election interview conducted with a farmer slaughtering turkeys in the background, and Tina Fey's spot-on impersonations of Palin on Saturday Night Live.
For this reason, Mike none@example.com says:
Read my previous posts again. My issue is with someone who advocates "God's gift of sexuality", but no advocating of responsibility. Read the quoted passage. Ragsdale is saying that hey, sex is fun, do it. And if a little hitch gets in the way, well heck we have this thing called abortion. And no matter how you want to slice it, that is irresponsible. And if you want to expand the argument, I would probably agree with you on every other point.
Despite the previous arguments, Thor has many reasons to think otherwise:
Bigfoot vs. Werewolf: Who will win the war of the monsters? this would never happen according to legion. for many reasons. 1.they were not that big. 2. the ... 20 hours ago
Gloria Feldt comes with a new idea:
3 Abortions Declined in Minnesota Last Year By Andy Birkey on Jul 2, 2009 - 8:00am | comments (3) Abortions declined in Minnesota in 2008 for the second straight year. Reproductive health advocates point to expanded access to birth control as the reasons for the decline.
However, David Jennings states that:
The other problem that Medina will have is that it is probable that the illustrious Texas Republican Party will endorse Hutchison or Perry. Or both (don t throw rocks at me; I ve seen them do similar work in the past). And that means that we can put little faith in any advice they provide.
Sources:
Zachary Roth PhDork Gloria Feldt Bob Hooper Suzanne Clueless Emma Sansego Tim Graham theotherryan The blogprof The Independent Mike none@example.com Thor David Jennings
Disclaimer:
This text is automatically generated from different sources on the internet. It must be considered an experiment
I would like to point out, before I address this, that this question not only goes far beyond Zach's framing - which was 'why did Scar get involved?' but conflates two things. This is like asking for a theory on the development of the universe that also - for believability's sake - explains why the universe should develop in a way that's just perfect for us. First, it's not perfect for us, 99.9999% of the universe would kill us instantly if we were there, and second, because we're a result of it, rather than it being tailored to us. Same basic thing here.
PhDork gives a bit of an idea about it:
PhDork says: June 23, 2009 at 2:09 pm SallyRidden: Women, even women who are pressured by their societies to denigrate/destroy other females, win out over female fetuses. I m only advocating abortion as something to celebrate as much as I m advocating appendectomy as something to celebrate. Both are medical procedures that sometimes need to happen. When they are needed and do happen, that s a good thing. It is good for people to have the health care they need.
In response, Gloria Feldt claims:
reproductive rights or guilt-tripping. All the faux-concern, hand-waving and rationalizing is just apologetics for the unpalatable fact that being anti-abortion means you expect some other women to go through a pregnancy and childbirth they don't want, in order to coddle your beliefs.
Still being unsure, Bob Hooper asks:
is-is : Great blog post Bob! Your brutally honest, graphic pin-point analysis with a certain smug edge to it, on hotly debated topics such as embryonic genocide puts a tingly feeling in my legs. There are so many ignorant and arrogant people out there today who just don’t understand science and politics like you do. Go Bob, keep on keeping us entertained! Posted by is-is | June 20, 2009 1:37 PM Posted on June 20, 2009 13:37
Suzanne thinks about it:
SoCon Or Bust Full Steam Ahead - It s good to see that there are some readers who are moving forward with Campaign Pro Vida : John, I have written to my bishop, and some of my friends hav... 1 day ago
Similarly, Clueless Emma adds:
"Abortions reduced by 300,000 a year during the Clinton years, stayed flat or increased during the Bush years, and if they resume their reductions during the Obama years, then many consistently pro-life people like me will conclude that we should judge administrations not by their words but by their fruits," Stassen triumphantly concluded in a recent piece for Sojourners, Jim Wallis s website for liberal religionists.
Sansego shows how it is done:
With the photo above, we can breathe a sigh of relief that Palin's resignation will mean no possibility of higher office for this queen of ignorance. If she still harbours the belief that she can become president after serving only half a term as governor of a low-population state on the margins of American culture and political life, she truly is more delusional than I previously gave credit for. 2012 is safe from the likes of Palin.
For this reason, Tim Graham says:
Bode also thought a more balanced show would have included a former pro-lifer who now denounces his role in the "Republican Party’s hate machine."
However, theotherryan thinks differently:
This is what I meant: when the culture is against something, no law is really necessary. When the culture is for something, no law is possible.
Still not being convinced, The blogprof replies:
The Other Club ...our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor. 6 hours ago The Rougblog Politics is not for the Common Man 1 hour ago
But The Independent has a different opinion:
Palin did not help herself by delivering what appeared to be a largely off-the-cuff address on Friday, in which it took 11 minutes to get round to mentioning she would resign. The speech looks set to become another Palin internet classic, alongside her catastrophic interviews with Katie Couric during the campaign, the post-election interview conducted with a farmer slaughtering turkeys in the background, and Tina Fey's spot-on impersonations of Palin on Saturday Night Live.
For this reason, Mike none@example.com says:
Read my previous posts again. My issue is with someone who advocates "God's gift of sexuality", but no advocating of responsibility. Read the quoted passage. Ragsdale is saying that hey, sex is fun, do it. And if a little hitch gets in the way, well heck we have this thing called abortion. And no matter how you want to slice it, that is irresponsible. And if you want to expand the argument, I would probably agree with you on every other point.
Despite the previous arguments, Thor has many reasons to think otherwise:
Bigfoot vs. Werewolf: Who will win the war of the monsters? this would never happen according to legion. for many reasons. 1.they were not that big. 2. the ... 20 hours ago
Gloria Feldt comes with a new idea:
3 Abortions Declined in Minnesota Last Year By Andy Birkey on Jul 2, 2009 - 8:00am | comments (3) Abortions declined in Minnesota in 2008 for the second straight year. Reproductive health advocates point to expanded access to birth control as the reasons for the decline.
However, David Jennings states that:
The other problem that Medina will have is that it is probable that the illustrious Texas Republican Party will endorse Hutchison or Perry. Or both (don t throw rocks at me; I ve seen them do similar work in the past). And that means that we can put little faith in any advice they provide.
Sources:
Zachary Roth PhDork Gloria Feldt Bob Hooper Suzanne Clueless Emma Sansego Tim Graham theotherryan The blogprof The Independent Mike none@example.com Thor David Jennings
Disclaimer:
This text is automatically generated from different sources on the internet. It must be considered an experiment
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)